Legal Opinion

Coverdill v. Northern Insurance Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 24, 1928No. Docket No. 151, Calendar No. 33,544PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPotter, J.

Plaintiffs sued defendant on a contract of insurance, alleging the loss by fire of the personal property insured by them in defendant, and defendant’s failure to pay. Defendant, under the general issue, gave notice of several defenses, only one of which is important — that the policy of insurance covered the personal property in a particular location and defendant never consented to insure the property in any other location. One Gamble solicited the insurance, delivered the policy, and collected the premium. The policy was issued by the Guthard Insurance Agency and countersigned by it. The…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Peoria Marine & Fire Insurance v. HallMichigan Supreme Court · 1864
  2. Steele v. German InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Pollock v. German Fire-InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
  4. North American Fire Insurance v. ThroopMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
  5. Ætna Live Stock, Fire & Tornado Insurance v. OlmsteadMichigan Supreme Court · 1870

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Pastucha v. RothMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Mattia v. Northern Ins. Co. of New YorkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
  3. Rorick v. State Mutual Rodded Fire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Hawkeye Casualty Co. v. HolcombMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Henne v. Glens Falls InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1929

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API