United States v. Kirkland
U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review
1Per curiam
Appellant was convicted at a general court-martial bench trial of nine specifications of larceny, in violation of Article 121, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 921. He was represented at trial by his appointed defense counsel and by individual military counsel. By the time of completion of the staff judge advocate’s post-trial review, the appointed defense counsel had been released from active duty. For this reason, an assistant defense counsel was appointed at that time to accept service of a copy of the review and was afforded an opportunity to comment on the review in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. GoodeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
- United States v. PaleniusUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
- United States v. HillUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
- United States v. VeilleuxU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1976
- United States v. SchoolerU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1975
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. JohnsonU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1978
- United States v. HuffstetlerU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1978