United States v. Huffstetler

CEDARBURG, Chief Judge:

This case causes us concern. We are convinced beyond any doubt that appellant has not been prejudiced by any omission or action below, but, nonetheless conclude that controlling case law requires us to direct a futile and useless action.

Appellant pleaded guilty to separate charges of conspiracy to violate Navy Regulations through the sale of marijuana, in violation of Article 81, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 881, and a violation of Article 92, UCMJ, by contravening Navy Regulations, the charge involving seven specifications alleging possession of a small quantity of heroin,…