Legal Opinion
North Cascades Conservation Council v. United States Forest Service
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided August 31, 1999No. C99-889RPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
ROTHSTEIN, District Judge.
THE COURT has heard oral argument and has considered the papers filed in support of and in opposition to plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction, including an amicus brief by certain outdoor recreation organizations. 1 Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 65, plaintiffs seek to preliminarily enjoin the defendants (collectively, the “Forest Service”), their employees, agents, or contractors, or anyone acting on their behalf, from constructing, proceeding with, and/or taking any further action on the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Amoco Production Co. v. Village of GambellSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Kleppe v. Sierra ClubSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- City of Davis, a Municipal Corporation v. William T. Coleman, Jr., Secretary of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Blue Mountains Biodiversity Project v. BlackwoodCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- City of Tenakee Springs v. CloughCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Texas Committee on Natural Resources v. Van WinkleDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2002
- Sierra Club v. United States Forest ServiceDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2012
- Soda Mountain Wilderness Council v. United States Bureau of Land ManagementDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2013
- Lindberg v. United States Forest ServiceDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2015
- Mountaineers v. United States Forest ServiceDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2006