Legal Opinion
Texas Committee on Natural Resources v. Van Winkle
District Court, N.D. Texas
Decided April 10, 2002No. CIV.A. 4:00CV384-YPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER PARTIALLY GRANTING PARTIES’ CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MEANS, District Judge.
Pending before the Court are two cross motions for summary judgment filed on July 6, 2001. Having carefully considered the motions, responses, and replies, the Court concludes that both motions should be PARTIALLY GRANTED in that Defendants 1 are entitled to summary judgment on all counts except count III(l), and upon which Plaintiffs 2 are entitled to summary judgment on count III(l).
I. BACKGROUND
This suit arises out of Defendants’ intent to construct the Dallas Floodway Extension (“DFE”) project, a…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Resource Investments, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- City of Shoreacres v. WaterworthDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2004
- Sierra Club v. Federal Highway AdministrationDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2010
- Town of Abita Springs v. U.S. Army Corps of EngineersDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2015
- Davis Mountains Trans-Pecos Heritage Ass'n v. United States Air ForceDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.