Legal Opinion

Soda Mountain Wilderness Council v. United States Bureau of Land Management

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided May 10, 2013No. 1:12-CV-434-CLPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PANNER, District Judge.

Plaintiffs claim that the U.S. Bureau of Land Management (BLM) violated the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the Federal Land and Policy Management Act (FLPMA) by approving the Sampson Grove Forest Management Project, a timber sale that would allow commercial logging on 500 acres of BLM land near Ashland, Oregon.

The parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment. Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke has issued a Report and Recommendation (R & R), recommending that defendant’s motion be granted except as to plaintiffs’ claim that defendant’s Environmental…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Norton v. Southern Utah Wilderness AllianceSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Robertson v. Methow Valley Citizens CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Kleppe v. Sierra ClubSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wild Wilderness v. AllenDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API