Legal Opinion

Metro-North Commuter Railroad v. Buckley

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 23, 1997No. 96-320PublishedCited by 194 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Breyer

The basic question in this case is whether a railroad worker negligently exposed to a carcinogen (here, asbestos) but without symptoms of any disease can recover under the *427Federal Employers’ Liability Act (FELA or Act), 35 Stat. 65, as amended, 45 U. S. C. § 51 et seq., for negligently inflicted emotional distress. We conclude that the worker before us here cannot recover unless, and until, he manifests symptoms of a disease. We also consider a related claim for medical monitoring costs, and we hold, for reasons set out below, that the respondent in this case has not shown that he is legally…

2Cases cited55 opinions

  1. Urie v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Dillon v. LeggCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Consolidated Rail Corporation v. GottshallSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway v. BuellSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. In Re Paoli Railroad Yard Pcb LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by194 opinions

  1. William Barnes v. The American Tobacco CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
  2. Baur v. VenemanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
  3. Caronia v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
  4. Philip Morris Inc. v. AngelettiCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  5. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. AyersSupreme Court of the United States · 2003

189 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API