Metro-North Commuter Railroad v. Buckley
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Breyer
The basic question in this case is whether a railroad worker negligently exposed to a carcinogen (here, asbestos) but without symptoms of any disease can recover under the *427Federal Employers’ Liability Act (FELA or Act), 35 Stat. 65, as amended, 45 U. S. C. § 51 et seq., for negligently inflicted emotional distress. We conclude that the worker before us here cannot recover unless, and until, he manifests symptoms of a disease. We also consider a related claim for medical monitoring costs, and we hold, for reasons set out below, that the respondent in this case has not shown that he is legally…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- Urie v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Dillon v. LeggCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Consolidated Rail Corporation v. GottshallSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway v. BuellSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- In Re Paoli Railroad Yard Pcb LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by194 opinions
- William Barnes v. The American Tobacco CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- Baur v. VenemanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- Caronia v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
- Philip Morris Inc. v. AngelettiCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
- Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. AyersSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
189 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.