Legal Opinion
Universal Rim Co. v. Scott
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided March 16, 1922No. 674PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WESTENHAVER, District Judge.
Plaintiff’s bill, filed by leave of court duly given, seeks an injunction restraining the defendant from manufacturing or selling certain demountable rim constructions alleged to be covered by the terms of the license agreement dated May 25, 1916, for the nonexclusive use of certain patents. The defendant has answered. The cause was heard upon application for a preliminary injunction and supporting and opposing affidavits. At the conclusion of the hearing, parties by consent submitted the cause as upon a final hearing for a decision and decree upon the merits.
The…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Pope Manufacturing Co. v. GormullySupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- United States Trust Co. v. Wabash Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Quincy, Missouri & Pacific Railroad v. HumphreysSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Sunflower Oil Co. v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Shubert Theatrical Co. v. RathCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Drackett Chemical Co. v. Chamberlain Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1933
- Meyer v. Washington Times Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1935
- Wynne v. AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Lathrop v. Rice & Adams CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1936
- National Welding Equipment Co. v. Hammon Precision Equipment Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1958
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.