Legal Opinion
Drackett Chemical Co. v. Chamberlain Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided March 13, 1933No. 6129PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HICKENLOOPER, Circuit Judge.
The Drackett Chemical Company, having commenced, in 1921, the manufacture of a drainpipe solvent which consisted of caustic alkali and powered aluminum, was served by the Chamberlain Company with notice of alleged infringement of its patents to Isaacs, No. 1,010,768, and to Smith, No. 1,019,377. Thereupon the two companies entered into negotiations which culminated on December 1,1922, in'a license agreement granting to the Drackett Chemical Company an exclusive right under these patents to sell to the grocery trade only. There is nothing in the record to show that…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Gayler v. WilderSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
- Marston v. . SwettNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
- United States v. Harvey Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1905
- H. C. White Co. v. Morton E. Converse & Son Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927
- Eureka Company v. Bailey CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1871
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Southern MacHine Company, Inc. v. Mohasco Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
- Lear, Inc. v. AdkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- The Troxel Manufacturing Company, and Cross-Appellee v. Schwinn Bicycle Company, and Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974
- Zenith Laboratories, Inc., on Behalf of Itself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Carter-Wallace, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Warner-Lambert Pharmaceutical Co. v. John J. Reynolds, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1959
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.