Legal Opinion

Ivy Ramsey v. Wellington Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 11, 1925PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.

— This is a suit for the specific performance of an alleged parol agreement to lease real property for a term longer than one year. The realty in question is a set of apartments on Lots 1 and 4 in Block 102 of Couch’s Addition to the City of Portland, owned in fee by the defendant. A lease of this property was made August 15, 1916, to Helen Ingerslev for three years with an option for an additional two years from August 15, 1919, to August 14, 1921, at a rate for the optional term to be agreed upon by the lessor and lessee and in case agreement could not be reached, the rental charge was to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Connell v. McLoughlinOregon Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Veterans' Welfare Board v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Dechenbach v. RimaOregon Supreme Court · 1904
  4. McKinney v. HindmanOregon Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Jones v. Marshall-Wells Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1922

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Phillips v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Smith v. VehrsOregon Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Conklin v. Karban Rock, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  4. Holt v. City of SalemOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Alexander v. AlexanderOregon Supreme Court · 1936

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API