Legal Opinion

United States v. Iverson

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided December 31, 1975No. CM 433471PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

DONAHUE, Judge:

The appellant was convicted of four violations of Article 92, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 892. The approved sentence is reflected above.

The court-martial that tried the appellant was convened by the Commanding General, Fort Carson and 4th Infantry Division (Mechanized). Because he and his staff judge advocate were disqualified from conducting the post-trial review and action, those duties were performed by the Staff Judge Advocate and Commanding General, 1st Infantry Division and Fort Riley. The appellant’s trial defense counsel…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. GoodeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
  2. United States v. MaslinskiU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1975

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. IversonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1978
  2. United States v. JonesU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1977
  3. United States v. MillerU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1976
  4. United States v. WallaceU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1976
  5. United States v. HoodU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1976

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API