Holiday Retirement Corp. v. State Division of Industrial Relations
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Douglas, J.:
In this appeal, we review a district court order denying a petition for judicial review in a workers’ compensation action. We conclude that the district court did not err in denying judicial review because an employer is required to acquire knowledge of an employee’s permanent physical impairment before a subsequent injury occurs to qualify for reimbursement from the subsequent injury account for private carriers under NRS 616B.587(4). Therefore, we affirm.
FACTS
Appellant Holiday Retirement Corporation hired a woman and her husband as co-managers of a retirement…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Kay v. NunezNevada Supreme Court · 2006
- Breen v. Caesars PalaceNevada Supreme Court · 1986
- Erwin v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1995
- Dutchess Business Services, Inc. v. Nevada State Board of PharmacyNevada Supreme Court · 2008
- Madera v. State Industrial Insurance SystemNevada Supreme Court · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Elizondo v. Hood Machine, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2013
- Degraw v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court of Nev.Nevada Supreme Court · 2018
- CITY OF HENDERSON VS. SPANGLERNevada Supreme Court · 2020
- Candelaria v. KellyNevada Supreme Court · 2023
- City of Henderson v. SpanglerCourt of Appeals of Nevada · 2020
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.