Legal Opinion

Holiday Retirement Corp. v. State Division of Industrial Relations

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 2012No. 54968PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Douglas, J.:

In this appeal, we review a district court order denying a petition for judicial review in a workers’ compensation action. We conclude that the district court did not err in denying judicial review because an employer is required to acquire knowledge of an employee’s permanent physical impairment before a subsequent injury occurs to qualify for reimbursement from the subsequent injury account for private carriers under NRS 616B.587(4). Therefore, we affirm.

FACTS

Appellant Holiday Retirement Corporation hired a woman and her husband as co-managers of a retirement…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kay v. NunezNevada Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Breen v. Caesars PalaceNevada Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Erwin v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Dutchess Business Services, Inc. v. Nevada State Board of PharmacyNevada Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Madera v. State Industrial Insurance SystemNevada Supreme Court · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Elizondo v. Hood Machine, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Degraw v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court of Nev.Nevada Supreme Court · 2018
  3. CITY OF HENDERSON VS. SPANGLERNevada Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Candelaria v. KellyNevada Supreme Court · 2023
  5. City of Henderson v. SpanglerCourt of Appeals of Nevada · 2020

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API