University of Michigan Regents v. Titan Ins Agency
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtKelly, C.J.
We examine whether MCL 600.5821(4), which preserves state entities’ rights to bring certain claims, also preserves the right to seek recovery of all damages incurred notwithstanding the one-year-back rule of MCL 500.3145(1). We hold that MCL 600.5821(4) exempts the state entities it lists from the *293one-year-back rule. As a consequence, we overrule Liptow v State Farm Mut Auto Ins Co,1 which held to the contrary, and reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals. We also overrule Cameron v Auto Club Ins Ass’n,2 on which the Liptow decision relied exclusively in reaching its conclusion.
FACTS AND…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Cameron v. Auto Club Ins. Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
- CAM Construction v. Lake Edgewood Condominium Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
- Department of Agriculture v. Appletree Marketing, LLCMichigan Supreme Court · 2010
- In Re Chamberlain's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
- Knutsen v. KrookSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Joseph v. Auto Club Insurance AssociationMichigan Supreme Court · 2012
- Johnson v. ReccaMichigan Supreme Court · 2012
- Davis v. ChatmanMichigan Court of Appeals · 2011
- Linden v. Citizens Insurance Company of AmericaMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
- ANGLERS OF THE AuSABLE, INC v. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITYMichigan Supreme Court · 2010
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.