Legal Opinion

Daniel v. Childress

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 1, 1964No. 8263PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUARK, Presiding Judge.

Plaintiff Henry Daniel came off second best in an encounter with a heifer calf and has secured judgment of four thousand dollars against defendant Childress, who now appeals. The suit arises out of an injury plaintiff received while assisting in a dehorning and vaccinating operation on defendant’s farm. Plaintiff was herding, or urging, the calf down a chute or runway leading into the place of operation. The calf had other notions. The result — broken ribs and this suit.

Plaintiff, thirty-eight years old at the time (March 14, 1961), had handled cattle “all my life” on…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Jewell v. Kansas City Bolt & Nut Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1910
  2. Schaum v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1934
  3. Morris v. Atlas Portland Cement Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1929
  4. Fitzpatrick v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1957
  5. Clark v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1903

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Chism v. White Oak Feed Co., Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Donald v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Lawley v. Kansas CityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. Mathes ex rel. Mathes v. TrumpSupreme Court of Missouri · 1970
  5. Mr. And Mrs. Wilson Mowry, Jr. v. Mr. And Mrs. Ernest SchmollCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API