Legal Opinion

Schaum v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided December 21, 1934PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This case, coming recently to the writer, is an action for damages for an injury to plaintiff's right eye alleged to have been sustained while working in a manhole. Plaintiff was employed by the Kansas City Telephone Company to do underground work, that is, work in connection with laying and replacing underground cables. Before he brought suit, the property and business of the Kansas City Telephone Company was taken over by the Southwestern Bell Telephone Company. At the trial plaintiff (respondent) dismissed as to the Kansas City Telephone Company (hereinafter referred to as the telephone…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. BehymerSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. Curtis v. McNairSupreme Court of Missouri · 1903
  3. Whitt v. . RandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  4. Coin v. John H. Talge Lounge Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1909
  5. Illinois Steel Co. v. MannIllinois Supreme Court · 1897

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Curt Peters and Cheri Peters v. Wady Industries, Inc., and Patrick TerrioSupreme Court of Missouri · 2016
  2. Rouchene v. Gamble Construction Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1935
  3. Kelso v. W. A. Ross Construction Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1935
  4. Carver v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
  5. Carver v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas R. Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1952

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API