Legal Opinion

Jewell v. Kansas City Bolt & Nut Co.

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided November 30, 1910PublishedCited by 52 opinions

Appeal from Jackson Circuit Court. — Hon. Henry L. McCme, Judge. (1) The relation of master and servant did not exist between the respondent and the defendant company. The respondent was not employed nor paid by the appellant company, and had no authority or control over him in the performance of his work.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Jackson Circuit Court. — Hon. Henry L. McCme, Judge. (1) The relation of master and servant did not exist between the respondent and the defendant company. The respondent was not employed nor paid by the appellant company, and had no authority or control over him in the performance of his work. The work of rolling iron, which he was engaged in at the time he was injured was being done for the defendant company by a lodge of the National Association of Iron, Steel and Tin Workers, under a written and printed contract, scales of prices set forth therein, based upon actual sales and…

1Opinion of the CourtWoodson, J.

This suit was begun in the circuit court of Jackson county, by the plaintiff, to recover the sum'of $25,000 damages for personal injuries sustained by him through the alleged negligence of the defendants.

A trial was had, and at the close of plaintiff’s evidence the court, at the request of defendants, gave a peremptory instruction directing the jury to find for the defendants. In obedience to that instruction the jury returned a verdict for them. Thereupon, the plaintiff filed his motion for a new trial, which was by the court sustained, and from this order and judgment the defendants duly…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. McGinnis v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1906
  2. Curtis v. McNairSupreme Court of Missouri · 1903
  3. Stephens v. Hannibal & St. Joseph RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1888
  4. Brazil Block Coal Co. v. HoodletIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Geismann v. Missouri-Edison Electric Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1903

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Badami v. GaertnerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Cook v. Globe Printing Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1910
  3. Paubel v. HitzSupreme Court of Missouri · 1936
  4. Duffy v. Midlothian Country ClubAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  5. Kleinlein v. FoskinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1929

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API