Legal Opinion

State v. Celusniak

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided April 15, 2004No. 23973PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PICKARD, J.

{1} Defendant entered a conditional plea in magistrate court, reserving the right to appeal her motion to suppress. This case is before us on appeal following the district court’s decision to deny the motion. The procedural posture of the case gives us the opportunity to clarify the approach for litigating reserved issues when a conditional plea is entered in the magistrate court. The merits of Defendant’s challenge of the district court’s denial of her motion to suppress give us the opportunity to explore issues of abandonment and consent when a passenger leaves a purse in…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. State v. GomezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. AttawayNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State v. Jason L.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2000
  4. United States v. Sharon Legail WelchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  5. State v. HodgeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State v. MartinezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2018
  2. State v. MartinezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2018
  3. State v. EgerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. State v. MorganNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2016
  5. State v. WintersNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2015

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API