State v. Quino
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*163OPINION OF THE COURT BY
KLEIN, J.
Defendant-Appellant Ferdinand Q. Quino (Quino) was convicted of promoting a dangerous drug in the first degree in violation of Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) § 712-1241(l)(a)(i) (Supp. 1991). The circuit court denied Quino’s pre-trial motion to suppress evidence. Subsequently, Quino was found guilty by a circuit court jury and sentenced to incarceration for a term of twenty years. On appeal before the Intermediate Court of Appeals (ICA), Quino argued that the circuit court should have granted his motion to suppress, because the evidence recovered was the product…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Florida v. BostickSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by91 opinions
- Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1999
- Commonwealth v. MatosSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- State v. RichieHawaii Supreme Court · 1998
- Commonwealth v. StouteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
- Baehr v. LewinHawaii Supreme Court · 1993
86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.