Legal Opinion
Tucker v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided April 21, 1994No. Civ. A. 3:93cv841PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PAYNE, District Judge.
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
Nathaniel Tucker seeks damages under the Federal Employers Liability Act (“FELA”), 45 U.S.C. §§ 51-60, for injuries he allegedly sustained while employed as a welder by Norfolk & Western Railway Company (“N & W”) at or near Disputanta, Virginia, on March 16,1993. This matter is presently before the court on N & W’s motion in limine which asks the court to prohibit Tucker’s counsel from engaging in ex parte communication concerning the subject matter of his case with any of N & W’s current employees.
At a hearing on March 14,1994, the following…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Marjetta Wilkinson v. Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
- Robert M. Cavanaugh, and Martha E. Cavanaugh v. Western Maryland Railway Company and Baltimore and Ohio Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
- Precision Piping & Instruments, Inc. v. E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
- McCallum v. CSX Transportation, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1993
- Stark v. Burlington Northern, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Armsey v. Medshares Management Services, Inc.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 1998
- State Ex Rel. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe RR. v. O'MalleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board Vs. James M. BoxSupreme Court of Iowa · 2006
- Watts v. Kroger Co.District Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1997
- Blasena v. Consolidated Rail Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1995
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.