Legal Opinion
Blasena v. Consolidated Rail Corp.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided October 6, 1995No. Civ.A. 93-4969PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CHESLER, United States Magistrate Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on the application of defendant Consolidated Rail Corporation (“Conrail”) for an order barring counsel for plaintiff from conducting “ex parte” interviews of defendant’s employees and seeking additional relief with regard to such interviews which have already occurred. The motion was referred to the undersigned by the Honorable Harold A. Ackerman, U.S.D.J. Oral argument was held on September 27, 1995.
BACKGROUND
This lawsuit was brought pursuant to the Federal Employer’s Liability Act, 45 U.S.C. § 51 et seq.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Alexander v. Primerica Holdings, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1993
- Public Service Electric & Gas Co. v. Associated Electric & Gas Insurance ServicesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1990
- Hanntz v. Shiley, Inc. a Div. of Pfizer, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1991
- Robert M. Cavanaugh, and Martha E. Cavanaugh v. Western Maryland Railway Company and Baltimore and Ohio Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
- Stack v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul and Pacific Railroad Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1980
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Shane Weibrecht v. Southern Illinois Transfer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
- Pratt v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1999
- Weibrecht, Shane v. Southern IL TransferCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001