Legal Opinion

Pacific Lumber & Timber Co. v. Dailey

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 23, 1910No. 8957PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Main, J., entered March 4, 1910, in favor of the defendants, after a hearing on the merits before the court without a jury, in an action to foreclose a materialman’s lien.

1Opinion of the CourtGose, J.

The plaintiff furnished certain building material to the defendant Dailey, who as a contractor was building a residence for the defendants Gaunce upon lot 4, block 25, in *567Denny-Fuhrman addition to the city of Seattle. The contractor having defaulted in payment, the plaintiff, on January 4, 1909, filed with the county auditor of King county a notice that it claimed a lien upon the property above described. This action was brought for the purpose of foreclosing the lien, and to secure a personal judgment against the contractor. After a hearing upon the merits, the court -denied the lien,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Holm v. Chicago, Milwaukee & Puget Sound Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1910

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Pierson v. SewellIdaho Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Standard Lumber Co. v. FieldsWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Columbia Lumber Co. v. BushWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Elder Mercantile Co. v. Ottawa Investment Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  5. Mawson-Peterson Lumber Co. v. SprinkleWyoming Supreme Court · 1943

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API