Legal Opinion

Young v. Robertshaw Controls Co.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided May 2, 1977No. Civ. A. 75-2609PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

TROUTMAN, District Judge.

This is an action seeking damages for injuries resulting from an explosion of a hot-water heater in plaintiff’s home in Lititz, Pennsylvania, on July 11, 1974. Plaintiff is a resident of Pennsylvania, while defendants Robertshaw Controls Company (Robertshaw), Rheem Manufacturing Company (Rheem) and Texgas Corporation (Texgas) are all incorporated in Delaware and have their principal places of business in Virginia, California and New York, respectively. The amount in controversy exceeds $10,000.00, so jurisdiction is based on 28 U.S.C. § 1332.

A…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Three Rivers Motors Company v. The Ford Motor Company and Auto Lite CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
  2. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,524 Carl Mintz and Shirley Mintz v. Mathers Fund, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972
  3. Burbage v. Boiler Engineering & Supply Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  4. Viola O. Tomalewski v. State Farm Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
  5. Restifo v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. Kaplan (In Re Kaplan)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. Hollinger v. Wagner Mining Equipment Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Wahsner v. American Motors Sales Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Reed v. SmithKline Beckman Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. In Re FRG, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1990

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API