Legal Opinion

East Baltimore Lumber Co. v. K'nessett Israel Aushe S'phard Congregation

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 12, 1905PublishedCited by 9 opinions

After the judgment in this case reported ante, p. 125, a motion for a re-hearing was made and in disposing of the same,

1Opinion of the CourtSchmucker, J.

The appellees, who were defendants below, have asked for a re-hearing of this appeal, and they urge in the brief filed in support of their motion, in addition to the grounds relied on in the argument of the appeal.

First, that we should not have reversed the judgment as to all three of the defendants when we held that the plaintiff had practically abandoned its case against the defendant, Silberman, and that the record contained no legally sufficient evidence to hold the Hebrew Congregation, and

Secondly, that we should have held in our opinion that, if any credit at all had been given to the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hanley v. DonoghueSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. Hanley v. DonoghueCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1883
  3. Myer v. GrafflinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1869

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Willner v. SilvermanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1909
  2. Walters v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1913
  3. Oldenburg & Kelley v. DorseyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1905
  4. Wilhelm v. HadleyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  5. Crown Realty Corp. v. WeinsteinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1939

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API