Legal Opinion
Crown Realty Corp. v. Weinstein
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided November 29, 1939No. [No. 37, October Term, 1939.]PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDelaplaine, J.
This suit was instituted in the Baltimore City Court by Nathan Weinstein and Morris King, appellees, against Crown Realty Corporation, appellant, and Hyman Rutkin and Sarah Rutkin, his wife, to recover on an alleged oral contract for painting a house on Park Heights Avenue in Baltimore City.
In March, 1938, after the appellant corporation had contracted to sell the property to Rutkin and wife for §2000, Weinstein and King offered to paint the house for §350. The painters, however, according to their testimony, declined to proceed on the credit of the Rut-kins, and Rutkin informed them that…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Davis v. PatrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Small v. SchaeferCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1866
- Elder v. WarfieldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1826
- Oldenburg & Kelley v. DorseyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1905
- Andre v. BodmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1859
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Strohecker v. Schumacher & Seiler, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1945
- Kline v. LightmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
- Weil v. Free State Oil Co. of Md.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1952
- Blumenthal v. HeronCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
- Kerner v. Eastern Dispensary & Casualty HospitalCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.