Legal Opinion
McIntosh v. Sullivan
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided July 1, 2003No. AC 22753PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FOTI, J.
The defendant, James F. Sullivan, the commissioner of transportation, appeals from the court’s denial of his motion to dismiss the plaintiffs complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.1 The defendant claims that the court improperly concluded that sovereign immunity did not deprive the court of subject matter jurisdiction over the plaintiffs claim because it fell within the scope of the state highway defect statute, General Statutes § 13a-144,2 which waives the state’s sovereign immunity. The defendant maintains on appeal that the plaintiffs allegations fall outside the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Shay v. RossiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Community Action for Greater Middlesex County, Inc. v. American Alliance InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Berlin Batting Cages, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Tyson v. SullivanConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
3Cited by5 opinions
- McIntosh v. SullivanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- McIntosh v. SullivanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- McIntosh v. SullivanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Stotler v. Dept. of TransportationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2014
- Streeter v. Bruderhof Communities in New York, Inc.Connecticut Superior Court · 2003