Legal Opinion
Blog v. Burden & Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 9, 1933PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCarswell, J.
The defendant corporation (hereinafter called Burden) made a contract on January 5, 1929, with I. I. and A. M. Reisman (hereinafter called Reisman) to operate a shoe department in Burden’s department store from January 5, 1929, to January 5, 1932. Reisman guaranteed to Burden a minimum return of $4,500 each year in connection with an agreement to pay to Burden ten per cent of gross sales. Settlements were to be had semi-monthly.
The 1931 gross sales did not produce the minimum guaranteed by Reisman. On December 16, 1931, they were $26,999.76 less *635than the guaranteed amount. The gross sales…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Seibert v. . DunnNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
- Richard Deeves & Son v. Manhattan Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
- Wilder v. BoyntonNew York Supreme Court · 1872
- Faulkner v. SwartNew York Supreme Court · 1889
- Andron v. FunkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
3Cited by6 opinions
- Constantino v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1979
- James Talcott, Inc. v. Winco Sales Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1964
- Stanford v. Cayuga Linen & Cotton Mills, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1939
- Termini v. John Arthur Exhibitions, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1957
- James Talcott, Inc. v. WeissCity of New York Municipal Court · 1934
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.