Legal Opinion

Stanford v. Cayuga Linen & Cotton Mills, Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 28, 1939PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKenyon, J.

The plaintiff, Joseph M. Stanford, resides in the city of New York. On or about the 18th day of June, 1986, more than three years ago, he commenced this action against the defendant, Cayuga Linen and Cotton Mills, Inc., upon a contract agreement alleged in the complaint to be in writing, whereby the Woodstock Mills is alleged to have agreed to manufacture 20,000 pounds of yarn weekly. The amount demanded by-the plaintiff in his complaint is $30,000 with interest from February 1, 1935. The separate defense set up by way of recoupment and setoff, by the defendant, amounts to $19,814.46.

The…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Blog v. Burden & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Schultz v. KobusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962
  2. Van Aalten v. MackNew York Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Stanford v. LinenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
  4. Weisinger v. BerfondNew York Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Bonfante v. Hadar Homes, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API