Termini v. John Arthur Exhibitions, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSidney A. Fine, J.
This application to vacate a judgment entered upon the granting of a motion made pursuant to rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice is predicated on “ plaintiff’s fraud in procuring the judgment, newly discovered evidence, error in fact, and in the interests of inherent justice ’ ’.
The claim of fraud, newly discovered evidence and error in fact is based upon the failure of plaintiff’s attorney to disclose to the court that, while representing a client other than the present plaintiff, he wrote a letter in which he claimed that the sublicense upon which this suit is based had become…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Dunn v. . Uvalde Asphalt Paving Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1903
- Seibert v. . DunnNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
- Keon v. Saxton & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Blog v. Burden & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
3Cited by2 opinions
- Spodek v. Park Property Development AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- James Talcott, Inc. v. Winco Sales Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1964