Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Heilman

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 18, 2005PublishedCited by 112 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY JOHNSON, J.:

¶ 1 This case returns to our Court for the third time in the past fourteen years. We are called upon to consider the propriety of the trial court’s dismissal without a hearing of Heilman’s second petition under the Post Conviction Relief Act (PCRA), 42 Pa.C.S. §§ 9541-46. With that petition, Heilman seeks testing under PCRA’s § 9543.1, the recently enacted section that permits an inmate to seek DNA testing of evidence used to convict him where such testing may establish his innocence of the crime(s) of conviction. The trial court dismissed Heilman’s petition because it…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  2. Commonwealth v. WeeksSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. Johnson v. MartofelSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. Williams v. Erie County District Attorney's OfficeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  5. Commonwealth v. McLaughlinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

3Cited by112 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WilliamsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  2. Commonwealth v. ConwaySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  3. Quynh Truong v. Allstate InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Commonwealth v. FordSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  5. Commonwealth v. BlackwellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

107 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API