Legal Opinion
Lalime & Partridge, Inc. v. Hobbs
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided February 27, 1926PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBraley, J.
The defendant in the first case not having argued his exceptions to the admission of evidence, they are treated as waived, and he not having excepted to the order of a verdict for the plaintiff, no error of law is apparent on the record.
In the second case the plaintiff, a manufacturer of boxes, bought of the defendant, hereafter called the company, a tractor to furnish power to operate his machinery. It is alleged that, the tractor upon trial being insufficient, he bought a second tractor, but, when used in combination, the tractors did not develop the power required. The counts in deceit…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Leavitt v. Fiberloid Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
- Glackin v. BennettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
- Danforth v. ChandlerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
- Edgar v. Joseph Breck & Sons Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899
- Gagnon v. Sperry & Hutchinson Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Narragansett Amusement Co. v. Riverside Park Amusement Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
- Murray v. BatemanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- Barrett Co. v. Panther Rubber Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1928
- Agoos Kid Co. v. Blumenthal Import Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
- Graham v. Jordan Marsh Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.