Legal Opinion

Agoos Kid Co. v. Blumenthal Import Corp.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 13, 1933PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrosby, J.

This bill in equity, although brought to reach and apply, has become a claim for damages arising from the alleged breaches of two contracts in writing for the purchase and sale of certain goat skins. The case was heard by a judge of the Superior Court sitting without a jury. A brief has been filed by counsel representing the National Association of Importers of Hides and Skins as amici curiae.

The eighth and ninth paragraphs of the bill relate, re*5spectively, to two claims which, it is agreed by the parties, are owed to the plaintiff, one for the sum of $4,633.43 with interest from June 19,…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Simmons v. FishMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  2. Parrot v. Mexican Central Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  3. Leavitt v. Fiberloid Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  4. Carleton v. . Lombard, Ayres Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1896
  5. Ward v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Home Gas Corp. of Massachusetts, Inc. v. Walter's of Hadley, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  2. Holt v. MannMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  3. Royal Paper Box Co. v. Munro & Church Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  4. Knapp Shoes, Inc. v. Sylvania Shoe Manufacturing Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
  5. Taylor v. JacobsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API