Legal Opinion
People v. Dillard
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
Decided March 29, 2018No. A141998PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSimons, J.
*109*1209Nanette Sheree Dillard and Paul Daniels appeal their convictions, following a jury trial, of crimes related to their work at an anti-poverty *1210agency, the Associated Community Action Program (ACAP or the Agency). We conclude two of appellants' convictions were preempted by federal law and reverse these convictions. We otherwise affirm.
PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Dillard and Daniels were charged by amended information with the following:
Count 1: Conspiracy to commit grant theft by false pretenses ( Pen. Code, §§ 182, subd. (a)(1), 487, subd. (a) )1 , with overt acts of drafting, signing, and…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Arizona v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Buckman Co. v. Plaintiffs' Legal CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Wisconsin Department of Industry, Labor & Human Relations v. Gould Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- People v. YeomanCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- Proceeding before the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. Hamilton, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- People v. HamiltonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018
- People v. Yeager-ReimanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2024