Legal Opinion

People v. Yeoman

California Supreme Court

Decided July 17, 2003No. S016719PublishedCited by 317 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*104Opinion

WERDEGAR, J.

A jury found defendant Ralph Michael Yeoman guilty of the first degree murder of Doris Horrell and found true the special circumstance that the murder occurred during the commission of a robbery. (Pen. Code, §§ 187, 190.2, subd. (a)(17)(A).)1

The jury also found defendant guilty of robbery and false imprisonment (§§211, 236) and found true the allegation that, in each of these crimes, defendant personally used a firearm (§ 12022.5). The jury found not true the additional special circumstance that the murder occurred during the commission of a kidnapping. (§ 190.2, subd.…

2Cases cited139 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

134 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by317 opinions

  1. People v. ColeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  2. People v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  3. People v. CoffmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  4. People v. AvilaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  5. People v. PartidaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005

312 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API