Legal Opinion

Slatten v. Mitchell

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided July 23, 1938PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFaw, P. J.

This cause was heretofore stricken from the docket of this court, after hearing oral argument of counsel, for the reason that it did not appear from the transcript filed here that an appeal had been granted by the Chancery Court; but in due season a petition for a rehearing was filed, accompanied by a duly certified supplemental transcript, from which it appears that an appeal had been granted to the defendants below, Joe Mitchell and wife, by the final decree of' the Chancery Court, and that the failure of the transcript as originally filed here to so show was due to the failure of the Clerk…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Kauffman v. GriesemerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1856
  2. Bunch v. ThomasTexas Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Smith v. City of SedaliaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1899
  4. Gulf Refining Co. v. FrazierCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1932
  5. Union Planters' Bank & Trust Co. v. Memphis Hotel Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1911

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Dixon v. City of NashvilleCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1946
  2. Zollinger v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1992
  3. Pyron v. ColbertTennessee Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Blackwell v. ButlerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1978
  5. Miller v. City of BrentwoodCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API