Legal Opinion

Nakamoto v. Kulongoski

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 12, 1995No. SC S42434Published

1Opinion of the Court

904 P.2d 165 (1995)

322 Or. 181

Lynn R. NAKAMOTO, Emilio Hernandez, Jr., Ruth Ascher, James Posey and Jann Carson, Petitioners,

v.

Theodore R. KULONGOSKI, Attorney General, State of Oregon, Respondent.

SC S42434.

Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.

Argued and Submitted August 29, 1995.

Decided October 12, 1995.

Scott J. Meyer, Portland, argued the cause and filed the petition for petitioners.

Richard D. Wasserman, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause and filed the response for respondent. With him on the answering memorandum were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L.…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Rooney v. KulongoskiOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Nakamoto v. KulongoskiOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Nelson v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Crumpton v. KeislingOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  5. McCoid v. KulongoskiOregon Supreme Court · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API