Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Bitter v. Missig

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 24, 1995No. 1994-2096PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 72 Ohio St.3d 249.] THE STATE EX REL. BITTER ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. MISSIG, CLERK, ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as State ex rel. Bitter v. Missig,

1995-Ohio-147.] Courts—Court of appeals has broad discretion in determining whether a party has obeyed its writ of mandamus—Supreme Court will not reverse court of appeals' decision absent an abuse of discretion. (No. 94-2096—Submitted March 21, 1995—Decided May 24, 1995.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Ottawa County, No. 94OT039. __________________ {¶ 1} On June 5, 1992, appellants,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Denovchek v. Board of Trumbull County CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. May v. Tandy Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Sorrell v. ThevenirOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Rock v. CabralOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  5. State ex rel. Fowler v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ross v. Ross, Unpublished Decision (8-18-2006)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. State v. JacksonOhio Court of Appeals · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API