Legal Opinion

People v. Stewart

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 12, 2001No. E026720PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HOLLENHORST, Acting P. J.

Notwithstanding a negotiated plea agreement that stipulated defendant was vulnerable to a six-year prison term, he challenges his six-year sentence. On our own motion, we noted that defendant had failed to obtain a certificate of probable cause and we asked the parties to file supplemental briefs addressing the significance of this fact. As discussed below, the appeal will be dismissed because defendant failed to comply with Penal Code section 1237.5 and California Rules of Court, rule 31(d).1 (See People v. Panizzon (1996) 13 Cal.4th 68 [51 Cal.Rptr.2d 851,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. People v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  2. People v. CooperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  3. People v. PanizzonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  4. People v. WaderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  5. People v. GiminezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. ButtramCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  2. People v. ButtramCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API