People v. Buttram
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BAXTER, J.
We address a conflict in the Courts of Appeal about the proper application of Penal Code section 1237.5 and rule 31(d) of the California Rules of Court.1 These provisions allow an appeal from a judgment entered on a guilty plea only if (1) the defendant obtains a certificate of probable cause from the trial court or (2) the appeal falls within the two categories of grounds that do not require a certificate. One “noncertificate” category involves postplea claims, including sentencing issues, that do not attack the validity of the plea.
In People v. Panizzon (1996) 13 Cal.4th 68…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- People v. Superior Court (Romero)California Supreme Court · 1996
- People v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- People v. PanizzonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- People v. HesterCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- People v. GiminezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by87 opinions
- People v. StampsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2020
- People v. FrenchCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- People v. SheltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- People v. CuevasCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- People v. Hurlic, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.