Legal Opinion

People v. Buttram

California Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 2003No. S103761PublishedCited by 87 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BAXTER, J.

We address a conflict in the Courts of Appeal about the proper application of Penal Code section 1237.5 and rule 31(d) of the California Rules of Court.1 These provisions allow an appeal from a judgment entered on a guilty plea only if (1) the defendant obtains a certificate of probable cause from the trial court or (2) the appeal falls within the two categories of grounds that do not require a certificate. One “noncertificate” category involves postplea claims, including sentencing issues, that do not attack the validity of the plea.

In People v. Panizzon (1996) 13 Cal.4th 68…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. People v. Superior Court (Romero)California Supreme Court · 1996
  2. People v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  3. People v. PanizzonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  4. People v. HesterCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  5. People v. GiminezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by87 opinions

  1. People v. StampsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2020
  2. People v. FrenchCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  3. People v. SheltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  4. People v. CuevasCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  5. People v. Hurlic, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018

82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API