Barovic ex rel. Microsoft Corp. v. Ballmer
District Court, W.D. Washington
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
JOHN C. COUGHENOUR, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on Nominal Defendant Microsoft Corporation’s Motion to Dismiss Complaint (Dkt. No. 19) and the Individual Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 23). Having thoroughly considered the parties’ briefing and the relevant record, the Court finds oral argument unnecessary and hereby DENIES both Motions for the reasons explained herein.
1. BACKGROUND
In December of 2009, European Union (EU) regulators dropped an antitrust case against Microsoft after nominal Defendant Microsoft Corporation agreed to offer European purchasers…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Zucco Partners, LLC v. Digimarc Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Fleming v. PickardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Stone v. RitterSupreme Court of Delaware · 2006
- In Re Caremark International Inc. Derivative LitigationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1996
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Levine v. LiverisDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2016
- Gould ex rel. Bank of America v. MoynihanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- LR Trust ex rel. SunTrust Banks, Inc. v. RogersDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2017
- Stanley Rubenstein v. Linda L. AdamanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2021