Legal Opinion

Blankenship v. Industrial Commission

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided May 14, 1928No. Civil No. 2680PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, C. J.

This is a proceeding in certiorari to review the findings of the Industrial Commission. Claimant, Blankenship, while an employee of the Apache Powder Company, on April 8th, 1927, claims to have suffered an injury to his back from an accident. He made demand for compensation. The Industrial Commission appointed a referee and sent him to the employer’s plant at Curtis, Cochise county, Arizona, to take the evidence. This was done on June 7th, 1927. The referee accompanied his report of the evidence with a recommendation that the claim for compensation be not allowed. Thereafter, on June 15th,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Federal Mutual Liability Insurance v. Industrial Commission of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Morgan v. Butte Central Mining & Milling Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Netherton v. Lightning Delivery Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Pacific Fruit Express Co. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Pierce v. Phelps Dodge Corp.Arizona Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Doby v. Miami Trust Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Savich v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Blasdell v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Grabe v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1931

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API