Legal Opinion

Pacific Fruit Express Co. v. Industrial Commission

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided July 5, 1927No. Civil No. 2616PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, C. J.

The petitioner, Pacific Fruit Express Company, self-insurer, seeks to have annulled an award made in favor of Marie Espinoza Grijalva, by the Industrial Commission, for the death of her son, Carlos Grijalva, upon whom she claims to have been dependent.

The Commission determined that Grijalva, who died on the sixteenth day of April, 1926, came to his death through accidental means while he was in the employ of the petitioner. It is the contention of the petitioner that the award cannot be sustained because it was not shown that the death of Garlos Grijalva was produced by causes arising out of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Lumberman's Reciprocal Ass'n. v. BehnkenTexas Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Bryant v. FissellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1913
  3. Larke v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
  4. Pace v. Appanoose CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1918
  5. Eugene Dietzen Co. v. Industrial BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1917

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Goodyear Aircraft Corp. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Goodyear Aircraft Corporation v. GilbertArizona Supreme Court · 1947
  3. McCampbell v. Benevolent & Protective Order of ElksArizona Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Peter Kiewit Sons' Co. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Strauss v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1952

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API