Legal Opinion

Toy v. Rickert

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided November 28, 1958PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

53 N.J. Super. 27 (1958)

146 A.2d 510

HORACE R. TOY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v.

GLENNIS S. RICKERT, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued October 27, 1958.

Decided November 28, 1958.

Before Judges GOLDMANN, CONFORD and HANEMAN.

Mr. Francis J. Beyrent argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Schenck, Smith & King, attorneys).

Mr. Harvey G. Stevenson argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Stevenson & Willette, attorneys).

The opinion of the court was delivered by HANEMAN, J.A.D.

Plaintiff sought damages for personal injuries alleged to have resulted from defendant's…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bornstein v. Metropolitan Bottling Co., Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
  2. Carbone v. WarburtonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
  3. Carbone v. WarburtonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
  4. Hull v. PlumeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1944
  5. Steinke v. BellNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Buckelew v. GrossbardSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
  2. ROSENBERG BY ROSENBERG v. CahillSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
  3. Mayor v. DowsettOregon Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Skripek v. BergamoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
  5. Buchanan v. DowningNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1964

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API