Legal Opinion

Skripek v. Bergamo

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided May 2, 1985PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

200 N.J. Super. 620 (1985)

491 A.2d 1336

JEAN E. SKRIPEK, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v.

ANGELO R. BERGAMO, M.D., DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued October 16, 1984.

Decided May 2, 1985.

Before Judges MICHELS, PETRELLA and BAIME.

Jean E. Skripek, appellant, argued the cause pro se.

Paul G. Nittoly argued the cause for respondent (Shanley & Fisher, attorneys, Mr. Nittoly, of counsel; Jeffrey S. Brown, on the brief).

The opinion of the court was delivered by MICHELS, P.J.A.D.

Plaintiff Jean E. Skripek appeals from a judgment of the Law Division entered on a molded jury…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Nieder v. Royal Indemnity InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2004
  2. Jerry W. Canterbury v. William Thornton Spence and the Washington Hospital Center, a Body CorporateCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
  3. Cobbs v. GrantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  4. State v. SimonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  5. Wilkinson v. VeseySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1972

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Largey v. RothmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
  2. Baird v. American Medical OpticsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
  3. Ostrowski v. AzzaraSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
  4. Brett v. Great American Recreation, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
  5. State v. BogusNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API