Legal Opinion

Martin v. Lockheed Missiles & Space Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 11, 1994No. H011590PublishedCited by 106 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BAMATTRE-MANOUKIAN, J.

Noreen Martin, a long-term employee of Lockheed Missiles & Space Company, Inc., was laid off at age 65. She sued Lockheed, alleging sex and age discrimination under the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (Gov. Code, § 12900 et seq.) and the cognate provision of the California Constitution (Cal. Const., art. I, § 8). Lockheed’s motion for summary judgment was granted; Martin appeals from the ensuing judgment. We shall conclude that Lockheed sufficiently established a legitimate business purpose for its personnel decision which ultimately led to termination…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Love v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by106 opinions

  1. Guz v. Bechtel National, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Romano v. Rockwell International, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Morgan v. Regents of the University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  4. Horsford v. Board of Trustees of California State UniversityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  5. Robert Rodriguez v. Airborne ExpressCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001

101 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API