Legal Opinion
Iowa Federation of Labor v. Iowa Department of Job Service
Supreme Court of Iowa
Decided July 20, 1988No. 87-1093PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LAVORATO, Justice.
In this judicial review proceeding we must decide whether the word “report” in a Job Service rule means the same as “pay.” The district court concluded it does not and we agree. We affirm but remand for further rule-making proceedings.
I. Background Facts and Proceedings.
In 1984 the respondent, the Iowa Department of Job Service, amended its rule set out at 345 Iowa Administrative Code 4.2(l)(e), 1 purportedly to authorize the payment of unemployment compensation benefits on a biweekly rather than weekly basis. See Iowa Code § 17A.4 (1983). The petitioners include the Iowa…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Barlow v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Gray v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Miriam Rodway v. The United States Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
- Norland v. Iowa Department of Job ServiceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1987
- Rybinski v. State Employees' Retirement CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Lockhart v. Cedar Rapids Community School DistrictDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1997
- Holiday Inns Franchising, Inc. v. BranstadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1995
- Nelson v. South Dakota State Board of DentistrySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
- Juttelstad v. JuttelstadSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Hollinrake v. Iowa Law Enforcement AcademySupreme Court of Iowa · 1990
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.