Legal Opinion
Bank of America Nt & Sa v. Hubert, Pc
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided February 4, 2003No. 19995-9-IIIPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
62 P.3d 904 (2003)
115 Wash.App. 368
BANK OF AMERICA NT & SA f/k/a Seafirst Bank, a National banking institution, Respondent,
v.
DAVID W. HUBERT, P.C., a Washington corporation; David W. Hubert and Katharine Hubert, individually and the marital community; Appellants,
M. Gail Kurpgewiet a/k/a M. Gail Williams and John Doe Williams, individually and the marital community, Defendants.
No. 19995-9-III.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3, Panel Eight.
February 4, 2003.
Patrick N. Rothwell, Attorney at Law, Seattle, WA, for Appellants.
Jed W. Morris, Lukins & Annis, Spokane, WA, for Respondent.
SWEENEY…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Williams v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Hertog v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- HERTOG, EX REL., SAH v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- Hizey v. CarpenterWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- Trask v. ButlerWashington Supreme Court · 1994
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Loeffelholz v. Citizens for Leaders With Ethics & Accountability NowCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
- BANK OF AMERICA NT & SA v. HubertWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- Bank of America NT & SA v. David W. Hubert, P.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2004
- Loeffelholz v. CITIZENS FOR LEADERSCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004