Legal Opinion
Alvarez v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation Act
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided December 9, 1952PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtInglis, J.
The question in this case is whether the unemployment of the plaintiffs was due to a labor dispute so that pursuant to § 7508 (3) of the General Statutes they are ineligible for benefits on account of that unemployment.
The facts found by the unemployment commissioner may be stated as follows: The seventy-eight union plaintiffs, who are appealing, were, on April 20, 1951, and prior thereto, production employees of the United Cloak Manufacturing Company, Inc., hereinafter referred to as United, of Stamford, Connecticut. They were members of Local 147 of the International Ladies’ Garment…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Allen Bradley Co. v. Local Union No. 3, International Brotherhood of Electrical WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- General Motors Corporation v. MulquinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1947
- Almada v. AdministratorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
- Conte v. EganSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
3Cited by11 opinions
- TR Miller Mill Company v. JohnsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
- Bartlett v. AdministratorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
- Devine Brothers, Inc. v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers Local 191Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
- Furber v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- Aaron v. Review Bd. of Indiana EmPloyment Security Div.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1981
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.