Legal Opinion
Conte v. Egan
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 21, 1949PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Jennings, J,
The examiner determined and the unemployment compensation commissioners and the Superior Court confirmed that the plaintiffs were unemployed because of a labor dispute in the factory where they were employed, that they did not come within the statutory exceptions and that they were therefore ineligible for unemployment compensation benefits from September 21, 1946, to October 20, 1946. The finding supports the conclusion, and in order to prevail on their appeal the plaintiffs must succeed in their attempt to have the finding corrected in accordance with their motion filed to that…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Unemployment Compensation Comm'n of Alaska v. AragonSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Beaverdale Memorial Park, Inc. v. DanaherSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
- Greenwich Gas Co. v. TuthillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
- Bigelow Co. v. WaselikSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
- Staff v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
3Cited by11 opinions
- Almada v. AdministratorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
- Bartlett v. AdministratorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
- Stapleton v. AdministratorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
- Bent v. TorellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
- Devine Brothers, Inc. v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers Local 191Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.