Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Director-General of Railroads

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided May 6, 1924PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParsons, C. J.

The court may properly refuse to give particular instructions which are not warranted by the evidence, Richmond v. Bethlehem, 79 N. H. 78, 80; Osgood v. Maxwell, 78 N. H. 35, 38; Challis v. Lake, 71 N. H. 90, 95, while it is reversible error to submit to the jury an issue upon which there is no evidence. Benoit v. Perkins, 79 N. H. 11, 14. Assuming, therefore, as the defendant .does in his brief, that the plaintiff correctly states the law in his request for instructions, the question presented by the case, which may be considered one of law because here cognizable, is merely one 'of fact…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Gahagan v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1900
  2. Nashua Iron & Steel Co. v. Worcester & Nashua RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1882
  3. Benoit v. PerkinsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1918
  4. Cavanaugh v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1911
  5. Waldron v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1902

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Stocker v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1928
  2. Clark v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1935
  3. Anderson v. Bingham & Garfield Ry. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Cleveland v. ReasbySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1943
  5. Olsen v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1925

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API