Legal Opinion

Clark v. Boston & Maine Railroad

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided December 3, 1935PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, C. J.

I. By reason of the decision in the former transfer of the case, the retrial now considered was confined, in respect to liability, to the issue of the last clear chance.

The defendant asserts that the evidence furnishes no support for a finding that the chance existed. This depends upon the time available for “saving action” after the plaintiff came into the fireman’s view. The fireman testified that this view was “As near as I can estimate, just coming off the crossing, that is, the cab of the engine would be on the south edge of the Bridge Street crossing.” The engineer’s testimony was that…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. McCarthy v. SoutherSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1927
  2. Carney v. Concord Street RailwaySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1903
  3. Jones v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1927
  4. Cavanaugh v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1911
  5. Precourt v. DriscollSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1931

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Wentworth Hotel, Inc. v. F. A. Gray, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1970
  2. Merchants Mutual Insurance v. Transformer Service, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1972
  3. City of Boston v. Boston Edison Company, City of Boston v. Boston Edison CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1958
  4. Marchand v. Public Service Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1949
  5. Sarkise v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1936

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API